More than 120 civil-society organisations and MLS/NWSL supporter groups have issued a public travel advisory ahead of the 2026 World Cup, warning immigrant, racial and ethnic minority, and LGBTQ visitors face elevated risks from U.S. immigration enforcement and government policies; FIFA and the White House have dismissed the concerns, turning safety and rights into a tournament flashpoint.
Civil society issues travel advisory ahead of World Cup 2026
More than 120 organisations — including Amnesty International USA, Reporters Without Borders, the ACLU and 20 MLS/NWSL-affiliated supporters’ groups from all 11 host cities — have urged fans, players, journalists and other visitors to exercise caution while travelling to the United States for the 2026 World Cup.
The advisory frames the risk as immediate: it singles out immigrant communities, racial and ethnic minorities and LGBTQ people as “most vulnerable to serious harm” because of current immigration enforcement practices and national policy trends.
What the advisory warns
Arbitrary denial of entry, detention and deportation
Signatories say visitors face heightened risk of being denied entry, detained or deported without clear recourse — a concern that cuts straight to the basic ability of some supporters or participants to attend matches.
Expanded travel and entry restrictions
The advisory cites recent limits on entries from dozens of countries as context for broader, unpredictable restrictions that could affect travellers’ plans.
Invasive screening of devices and social media
Organisations warn of searches and social-media screening at borders, and advise visitors to remove sensitive data and disable biometric locks — practical steps that underline a deeper surveillance anxiety.
“Violent and unconstitutional” immigration enforcement
The letter alleges racial profiling and discriminatory enforcement tactics, and points to the presence of immigration officers at airports and event sites as a central fear for communities of colour.
Suppression of speech and protest
Signatories raise concerns that the tournament’s security environment could curb peaceful protest and restrict free expression in host cities.
Risk of mistreatment in immigration detention
The advisory highlights recent deaths in immigration custody and general mistreatment concerns for anyone detained — a potent human-rights argument against complacency.
Who signed and why this matters
The coalition blends national human-rights NGOs with grassroots coalitions and soccer supporters’ groups, making the warning unusual: it comes from inside the host country and from stakeholders directly tied to the sport. That mix gives the advisory both legal gravitas and cultural resonance — supporters’ groups are not neutral observers; their alarm signals a credibility problem for organisers if concerns go unaddressed.
FIFA and the White House push back
FIFA emphasises its human-rights commitments and published frameworks tied to the tournament, presenting policies and advisory mechanisms as mitigation. The White House and its World Cup task force have strongly rejected the travel-warning narrative, characterising the United States as prepared and secure and dismissing activists’ claims as alarmist. Those rebuttals settle little for communities already sceptical of enforcement agencies being present at stadiums and transit hubs.
Practical impact on fans, teams and host cities
This advisory risks reshaping how the tournament is experienced. Fans from affected communities may alter travel plans or demand stronger guarantees; players and media may feel pressure to seek assurances; host cities face reputational and logistical strain. Economically and culturally, a perception that certain visitors are unsafe undermines the tournament’s promise of inclusive global celebration.
What to watch next
Organisers should produce clear, public commitments: defined limits on immigration enforcement in and around match venues, transparent coordination with local authorities, and concrete measures to protect protesters and visitors. FIFA’s human-rights mechanisms will be judged not by statements but by enforceable guarantees and independent oversight. If left unaddressed, the dispute could erode trust among supporters and amplify calls for boycotts or demonstrative protest.
Why it matters for the game
The 2026 World Cup is both a sporting spectacle and a political test. Delivering a safe, rights-respecting event will require more than rhetoric from FIFA and government officials.
Picked by Brazil, praised by Klopp, Red Bull New York's stunning new training facility opens
Practical safeguards and meaningful engagement with civil-society demands are the only reliable path to ensuring fans can legitimately claim the tournament as a global celebration rather than a contested political stage.
Theathleticuk
